The Queen, Charles and Cambridges unite in threat to boycott BBC over ‘tittle tattle’ documentary

The Queen has united with Prince Charles and Prince William in a threat to boycott the BBC over a documentary alleging vicious briefing wars between members of the Royal Family.

The Palace is furious that the Corporation has refused to let it see The Princes And The Press before it airs on BBC2 tomorrow, and says it will refuse to co-operate on future projects unless it is given a right to respond.

Last night, a senior royal source condemned the documentary as ‘tittle-tattle’ and said the row over the programme had left the 95-year-old Monarch ‘upset’.

The Queen has united with Prince Charles and Prince William in a threat to boycott the BBC over a documentary alleging vicious briefing wars between members of the Royal Family. Prince Harry and Prince William pictured on July 1 this year at the unveiling of Princess Diana’s statue in Kensington Palace

The film is presented by Amol Rajan – a self-declared republican who has described the Monarchy as ‘absurd’.

In a highly unusual move, the three most senior Royals have joined together to complain to the Corporation – and threatened a ‘tri-household’ boycott if it goes ahead with the programme as planned.

Despite a series of meetings between Prince William’s representatives and the Corporation, the source said the BBC was still refusing to show the programme to courtiers before broadcast. 

A Palace source said: ‘There is upset about it. The households are all united in thinking this is not fair. No one at the Palace has seen it.’

The BBC says the two-part programme will provide ‘context’ for William and Harry’s relationship with the media.

But while Palace insiders say ‘we’ll judge it when we’ve seen it’, sources believe the film will suggest that the brothers – or advisers working for them – ‘briefed against each other’ to the media and want a fair right to reply.

The allegation that William and Harry instructed courtiers to plant smears against each other in the media is particularly sensitive for the Princes. They successfully united to block the same allegation from appearing in another documentary earlier this year.

Claims by Omid Scobie, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s biographer, that Prince William and his staff had leaked a story about Prince Harry’s mental health were cut from the primetime documentary Harry And William: What Went Wrong? hours before it was broadcast on ITV in July.

Queen Elizabeth II and the Prince of Wales walk to the Balmoral Cricket Pavilion to mark the start of the official planting season for the Queen’s Green Canopy in October this year

Media speculation about the relationship between the brothers was rife for more than a year before Harry revealed the full extent of their rift during a tour of South Africa in 2019.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex gave a revealing interview during the trip to ITV’s Tom Bradby in which Meghan claimed that no one in the Royal Family had asked if she was ‘OK’ with her new role.

Harry could barely conceal his disagreements with his brother, saying of William: ‘We are certainly on different paths at the moment but I will always be there for him and I know he will always be there for me. We don’t see each other as much as we used to because we are so busy but I love him dearly.

‘The majority of stuff is created out of nothing but as brothers, you know, you have good days, you have bad days.’

While the princes disagreed on many points, they were aligned on the issue of their press operations.

It has previously been claimed that each office was briefing the media against the other but they have persistently denied it.

It is understood that unless Monday’s documentary removes these allegations, the three households have threatened to withdraw co-operation for future BBC projects such as interviews or documentaries. Such a move would mark the end of a long relationship between the Royal Family and the BBC, which screened a tribute to the late Prince Philip this year and broadcast Earthshot, a five-part series about climate change which was presented by Prince William.

The BBC is also part of a rota system, shared with ITV and Sky, to film the Queen’s Christmas speech.

Yet the relationship has been tested over the years. In 2007, the BBC was forced to apologise to the Queen after admitting it ‘misrepresented’ her by implying she stormed out of a photoshoot.

In May, William launched a scathing attack on the BBC after its failings on the Martin Bashir interview with his mother, Princess Diana, were exposed.

The latest dispute also follows a series of allegations of Left-wing bias at the BBC. With the Corporation embroiled in tense negotiations with the Government over the future of the licence fee after the end of the current Royal Charter in 2027, director-general Tim Davie has promised that the BBC will meet ‘the highest standards’ of impartiality in future.

Princes William and Harry set aside their differences at the event in July to unveil a new statue of their mother, Princess Diana, on what would have been her 60th birthday

Mr Rajan, a presenter for Radio 4’s Today programme and one of the frontrunners to succeed Laura Kuenssberg as the BBC’s next political editor, wrote in 2012: ‘When I write about our absurd Monarchy, the really stupid stuff comes flying in. So today, in order to save some of you precious time, I thought I’d do some clarifying.

‘The stupidest thing said about republicanism is that republicans lack patriotism. I’ve said a few times before here, and will doubtless say again: I’m not a republican despite being a patriot, I’m a republican because I’m a patriot.

‘I love my country and want it to be a place where any boy or girl could grow up to be our head of state, not one where Charles Windsor is appointed by birthright.’

A senior BBC insider told this newspaper last night that there were ‘always bumps in the road on productions like this’ but managers at the Corporation had agreed that it did not breach any of the BBC’s editorial guidelines on impartiality.

The source added: ‘You can’t make a documentary about royal journalism without mentioning briefings. It doesn’t point the finger at any individuals.’

Advance publicity for the programme, which airs at 9pm tomorrow, says it will document the years in which the Cambridges and the Sussexes ‘have charted very different courses in their relationship with the media’.

Mr Rajan conducted more than 80 hours of interviews, speaking to ‘the journalists who were covering the story, then found themselves becoming part of it’.

The first hour-long episode covers the years following the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee in 2012 ‘and the positive media reaction to the emergence of a new generation of Royals’ up to the 2018 marriage of Harry and Meghan.

A BBC spokesman said last night: ‘The programme is about how royal journalism is done and features a range of journalists from broadcast and the newspaper industry.’

Just the latest nail in the coffin of the relationship between Palace and BBC 

By Kate Mansey

The relationship between the Royal households and the BBC has become increasingly strained in recent years following a series of rows over the Corporation’s conduct.

Perhaps most infamously, the BBC was forced to apologise to the Queen in 2007 for ‘misrepresenting’ her in a documentary. Journalists were shown a clip from A Year With The Queen in which celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz was seen asking the Queen to remove her crown so the shot would look ‘less dressy’.

Her Majesty was shown replying: ‘Less dressy? What do you think this is?’

The following scene showed her walking away and complaining to an aide: ‘I’m not changing anything. I’ve done enough dressing like this, thank you very much.’

BBC1’s controller at the time, Peter Fincham, said: ‘Annie Leibovitz gets it slightly wrong and the Queen walks out in a huff.’

In truth, however, the Queen had made her comments before the request to remove her crown and the sequence was edited to wrongly suggest the Queen had flounced out of the session.

Video grabbed image taken from BBC1’s A Year with the Queen programme of Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II arriving for a photo shoot with America’s most famous celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz. The BBC had wrongly suggested the video showed her angrily storming out in 2007

The Corporation had to apologise again five years later when its security correspondent Frank Gardner recounted a private conversation in which the Monarch told him that she had lobbied a Home Secretary to secure the arrest of the radical Islamist cleric Abu Hamza.

Mr Gardner said the Queen had personally told him she was aghast that Hamza could not be detained despite spouting anti-British bile as an imam at Finsbury Park mosque in North London. The BBC wrote to the Queen to express regret for the ‘wholly inappropriate’ broadcast.

Hamza is now serving a life sentence in America.

Earlier this year, Prince William condemned the BBC over its failure to investigate the ‘deceitful behaviour’ of its journalist Martin Bashir to obtain an explosive Panorama interview with his late mother, Princess Diana, in 1995.

In a withering statement to reporters after an investigation by Lord Dyson exposed the Corporation’s shameful cover-up of Bashir’s activities, William said: ‘If the BBC had properly investigated the complaints and concerns first raised in 1995, my mother would have known that she had been deceived.

‘She was failed not just by a rogue reporter, but by leaders at the BBC who looked the other way rather than asking the tough questions.’

Tensions between the BBC and the Royal Family have existed for decades. The Queen is said to regret agreeing to a fly-on-the-wall documentary broadcast in 1969 which included footage of the family enjoying a barbecue at Balmoral and Prince Charles water-skiing. The 105-minute film was locked away, reportedly at the Monarch’s request, but re-appeared briefly on YouTube in January before being removed.

<!—->

Advertisement

Charging through the BBC ranks, it’s ‘Amol Nitrate’ 

By Glen Owen and Chris Hastings

Amol Rajan is the ubiquitous BBC presenter who has been described by envious colleagues as having ‘the sharpest elbows in Broadcasting House’.

Dubbed ‘Amol Nitrate’, because of his energetic and irrepressible nature, 38-year-old Rajan has risen through the ranks at warp speed – and is being tipped internally to succeed the Corporation’s all-powerful political editor Laura Kuenssberg when she steps down at the turn of the year.

At a time when white middle-aged broadcast veterans such as the BBC’s Andrew Marr and Sky’s Adam Boulton are ‘seeking new challenges’, republican Rajan has come to symbolise the changing of the media guard.

Earlier this year, he ruffled the feathers of another BBC veteran, the Today Programme’s Nick Robinson, when he was added to the roster of the Radio 4 programme.

Robinson, 58, objected, telling managers that the ‘optics’ of appointing a fifth presenter at a time of budget cuts to programmes looked bad for the Corporation.

Yet Rajan won plaudits for his honesty when he confessed that he had a ‘full-on panic attack’ the night before his first appearance on the programme in May. He described how he had ‘worked myself up into a frenzy, catastrophising… had three massive rums and a bit else. Got 1hr kip. In at 3.45. Survived’.

SHARP ELBOWS: The corporation’s media editor Amol Raja

The reference to ‘a bit else’ sparked speculation that he had smoked marijuana, as he is known to be an advocate of legalising cannabis and other drugs. He later, however, clarified that had been referring to sleeping pills.

Rajan’s jocular style raised hackles this month while interviewing BBC colleague John Simpson, who was reporting from Afghanistan. He told the veteran correspondent: ‘Keep going out there, mate.’

Rajan also doubles as the BBC’s media editor and has stood in for Zoe Ball and Jeremy Vine on their popular Radio 2 shows.

He also has stints presenting BBC1’s The One Show and Radio 4’s Start The Week under his belt and, in a breathless press release earlier this year, the Corporation said he was due to host a series of interviews on BBC2 with ‘high-profile global guests who are shaping the way we live today’.

Insiders say the father-of-two, who often wears an earring in his left ear, is highly valued by BBC bosses because of his ability to appeal to normally hard-to-reach younger viewers and listeners.

After arriving in the UK at the age of three, he was raised and state-educated in Tooting, South London.

He studied at Cambridge University before embarking on his media career. After a stint as a day-time TV researcher, Rajan joined The Independent newspaper, where he worked as a news reporter, sports correspondent and columnist before becoming the title’s editor at the age of just 29.

He joined the BBC in December 2016, months after The Independent’s print edition closed. One BBC source said in March: ‘The BBC’s management is dazzled by Rajan, and seem to think that every big job has to go to him. His magnificent vanity is tied up in a grotesque false modesty, allied to an acute understanding of power plays.’

Rajan is married to Charlotte Faircloth, an associate professor at University College London’s Institute of Education, whose books include Militant Lactivism? Attachment Parenting and Intensive Motherhood in the UK and France.

The pair met at Cambridge, where she got a PhD in social anthropology, and now live in London with son Winston and daughter Jamaica.

A lifelong cricket fan, Rajan has played for the Authors XI team alongside historians Peter Frankopan and Tom Holland and in 2013 published the book Twirleymen, a history of spin bowlers.

Rajan, who has 100,000 followers on Twitter, is not afraid to engage with critics. When one described him as a rude boy – slang for lawless urban youth – because of his earring and dress sense, he replied: ‘Of course I’m a rude boy, mate. My daughter’s name is Jamaica.’